Are You Good With Women Or Good At Seducing Women?

The importance of reading and understanding this article cannot really be stated with mere words.

The reason is because if you do not understand the underlying principle behind this, you will flounder about aimlessly in the seduction community until you run out of gas, get frustrated, and then quit worse with women than you started.

With that said…

What exactly is the difference between someone who is “good with women” and someone who is good at seducing women?  At first glance, it looks like nothing much, they almost look like they’re the same thing.

The truth is, they could not be more different, and my question to you is simple:

What exactly are you “good with women” at?

You see, most people think that being good with women means they can make them laugh, means that they’re the type of guy that can naturally attract women, and other community-fed bullshit.

They start talking about being self-amusing, giving value to others, and other feel-good stuff that sounds great on paper and helps scam artists sell products.  All these products do is feed on the average guy’s image that there’s a ton of reasons why they’re not good with women yet.

Let me ask you… what does it actually mean to be naturally attractive to women?  Oh that’s right–when you take the root of the word natural and get NATURE, you would realize that the only requirement to be “naturally attractive” to a woman is to be MALE.

While we’re on the subject, what the hell does it even mean to “get good with women“?

Just take a look at most “pick-up artists” who are out in the wild, regardless of school of thought or anything… you’ll see that they are ALL trying to “get good with women“.

Unfortunately, all they get good at is falling for the delusion that they’re getting better at an abstract concept that doesn’t even exist in the real world.

To illustrate this point, let’s say you told your buddy a statement  like, “I’m going to go out and get good at stuff”. He would probably slap you upside your head for being an idiot.

Doesn’t that statement sound eerily similar to what most guys who try to get better with women say day in and day out?

Consider this article your therapeutic wake-up slap upside your head.

The dirty truth most guys don’t want to admit is that usually most guys who get into the community don’t ever want to get good at seducing women.  They keep claiming they want to “get good with women”, and it’s true–but their definition of “get good with women” really means getting good reactions from them.  They think that if you’re getting good reactions from a girl, she’s eventually just going to want to have sex with you.

And so the attraction-centered “seduction” community is formed, which supposedly will help you change yourself into the type of guy a girl is going to pick to have sex with.

That’s the ultimate male fantasy though isn’t it?  To attract women without ever having to face rejection.  How great would it be to avoid ever having a girl you’re attracted to thinking that you’re lame, asexual, and that she wants nothing to do with you?

This attraction-based community is commonly seen running around trying to hit state in order to say some stupid and silly ass shit to women because they think it is “alpha”, or to show that they are “indifferent”, and that it shows how “solid” they are to their pick-up bros.

The other ones feed off laughter and positive female affection from women they talk to.  They think they’re doing real great!  They tell themselves they were close to doing well with a girl and that they just needed to escalate more after a completely platonic interaction, oblivious to the fact that he quite possibly is not her sexual type at all and he just wasted 15 minutes of his life.

Do not be mistaken for a second, these guys are in it to tell themselves they “did good with women”, even if after talking to a few hundred women… they only get one or two hookups out of it.

Let’s take a look at what should be a pretty typical situation:

A guy randomly bumps into a girl in the street, a very brief conversation forms up organically.  They talk and flirt for a little bit, she’s laughing and saying things like “Oh my gosh, I’m so glad I met you today… I was kind of down but you really made my day!”

The guy feels electricity running through his body at the sound of how “pimp” he is, he knows he should probably try to instant-date her, but with things going so great, why risk a great interaction going badly?

So they part ways, the girl looks genuinely happy, the guy kicks himself a little bit for not “escalating” more and pushing it, but he’s happy because he “gave her value” and the interaction went well.  His buddy watched the whole thing down and walks over, congratulating him on how “good” he’s getting.

Let’s say the background story for this woman is that recently had her husband whom she loved passed away.  Let’s also say that because the conversation formed up organically, there was no trace of him trying to “pick her up”, and so she felt comfortable in talking with him.

There’s no way in hell she’s open to getting into a relationship or hooking up with another guy so quickly after her husband’s death, but she’s much more than happy to have a platonic, non-threatening guy regale her with funny stories and vibing with her.

Let me ask you something: what “good” came out of this for our hero, except for inflating some false sense of how good he is at getting a reaction out of a woman?  Better yet, what good did this positive reaction out of her do for him?

Because let’s twist the storyline a bit and say he escalated hard on her.  Now she looks horrified and runs away from him, telling him to get away.  Aww… the poor guy doesn’t have a pimp posh story to tell to his buddies anymore… how horrible.

He’s lost a great story to make him look good, but he gained experience in seducing a woman; regardless of how she responds to it.  He also knows that things will not work out between him and that woman, and it only took him a few minutes to find out concretely.

Two different sets of actions, two different results because of circumstance.  One he’s guaranteed to add firewood to the bonfire he has going on labelled “how pimp I am“, and the other he’s trading sure thing of a positive memory and experience for just a lame possibility of hooking up with her.

Knowing all that, is it any wonder that most guys don’t want to be good at seducing women?

Look, if you merely want to be a clown who is good at having fun with new women and meeting them in a platonic way, then sure!  You can keep trying to “get good with women”!  You can learn to give her more VALUE than a McDonald’s Extra Value Meal man!

Guess who else fits that same criteria?  Gay guys, who have arguably more fun with women and have deeper friendships and connections with them than you ever will.  Maybe a lifestyle change is in order for most aspiring pick-up artists?

If you’re straight though, I think you would have to agree that the real goal of any seduction is to actually SEDUCE the woman. (I know, it takes a genius to figure that one out right?)

Since seduction is really just enticing someone to do something they already want to secretly do as opposed to doing something they DON’T want to do, wouldn’t this be a good time for you to take personal inventory of WHAT exactly you do to try to seduce women?

Is what you’re doing helping you to seduce her?  Or are you engaging in blatant and counter-productive faggotry when you go out?

The HARDEST thing by far to do in seduction science is to GIVE UP being good at getting reactions from women, or purposely trying not to be funny or entertaining if you are naturally.

Nothing you do will EVER come close to moving a seduction forward quite like escalation.

I think that statement warrants being repeated:

NOTHING!

Not telling her funny stories, not cocky funny, not in-state bullshit, not being alpha, not being a caveman, not push pull, not NLP, not IMPRESSING her with anything that you are, none of that shit is ever going to be as effective FOR MOVING A SEDUCTION FORWARD as straightforward escalation.

My really good buddy performs improv comedy regularly as a hobby for audiences and he is one of the funniest guys I know because of it.  He told me it was one of the hardest things for him to actually “cripple” his conversations with women and to put a leash on the wild and hilarious tangents he would go off on.

He told me that to his surprise, when he switched to actively SEDUCING women instead of just merely having fun and being one of the funniest people naturally, he started sleeping with 4-5x more of the women he met while out.

To give up the things that most others think is your strongest suit is going to be one of the hardest things you ever do, but let me re-iterate that it is a necessary task if you want to truly be able to get good at seducing women.

Let’s create two hypothetical seduction situations, and you tell me which you would be more receptive to.  One you have a really famous international male celebrity who wanted to do you from behind– and the other is your average girl in every aspect who walked up to you, took your hand, and told you to follow her up to her place?

Yeah, I thought so.  Always remember that.  No matter how good you get at pushing buttons, making people laugh, having social proof, or any of that shit, none of that will EVER compare to the average guy following nature.

This is the core of the new wave of seduction.

Traditional seduction (if it can even be called that) relies on giving away every natural advantage that nature gives you.  In exchange, you are trying to fit some trendy model of what some random girl has in her mind about who she “wants”.

You are trying to logically convince her that you fit her picture of who she wants to hook up with that night.

The time-tested methods of natural attraction are rooted in the fact that nothing you can ever logically say or do will ever be more powerful than the forces of nature.

This same girl could be aghast at how such a socially repulsive guy is compelling her to mate with someone whom she doesn’t think she likes, and she knows THE ONLY THING she can do to stop this is to bait you into breaking rapport with her.

Do you see yet how trying to convince a woman’s logical brain to like you while paying little to no attention to her  raw and animalistic side is one of the most stupid endeavors you could ever set out to do?

You cannot awake a woman’s uncontrollable compulsion to mate with you at all costs by appealing to her mind of what she logically likes or not.  You can only awake it with a basic ability to keep the seductive vibe on, persistent escalation, and an ability to handle all her logical objections about how she’s not into guys like you without breaking rapport with her.

This night and day difference, my friend, is the difference between being “good with women” and being good at seducing women.

{ 38 comments… read them below or add one }

M September 15, 2010 at 6:11 am

So you mean EVERYTHING is mental masturbation, just test the girl with seductive vibe, MHC-attempt and sex-offer attempt?

Reply

Sixty September 15, 2010 at 2:26 pm

varying levels of MM. Get into a conversation with a girl, SEDUCE her with vibe, escalate with MHC and pleasure offer. Yes that is 60 method summed up in 1 sentence. What else would you need?

Reply

M September 15, 2010 at 2:49 pm

Nice!

Reply

M September 15, 2010 at 6:26 am

I have a quote from a book, Sixty, I’m interested in your opinion of it.
“Stupid man silly strives for a loved woman, but intelligent man has an ability to present it in beautiful and different shapes, charm with his speeches, clothes, manners and acts”

Reply

M September 15, 2010 at 7:03 am

I have a natural friend, girls are always chasing him and he gets a lot of sex.
He is just a good-looking guy, not smart, but with a very positive attitudes and a good lifestyle.
His game is a lot of talking, lots DHVs about status and lifestyle, no-shame talk how he fucks girls without condom. After that the girls usually start kinoing him and chasing him.
But he is very ego-based, breaks up with a girl if she talks to other guys, gets STDs 4 times a year, can’t handle rejections, and never keeps privacy.
Is he stupid or intelligent? ;)

Reply

Sixty September 15, 2010 at 2:31 pm

Being traditionally good looking with good social skills will put you in a position to have women who like that archetype chase you a lot. Good looking people I’ve coached are generally all good at pulling the trigger when they know she’s into him, but have little to no skills in seducing women who are not outright chasing him… even if she’s attracted to him

Your description of him = cookie cutter good looking guy who knows how to handle girls who throw themselves at him, but you tell me whether it’s preferable to only be able to pick women who chase you or to seduce women of all shapes, sizes, and colors

Reply

M September 15, 2010 at 8:30 am

“Because let’s twist the storyline a bit and say he escalated hard on her.”
” That’s why it’s such a joke when you see a guy buying the excuses women give for still not getting physical after several dates.”

What about Needs1&2 and neediness not for love, but for sex?
This way the best guy is a prisoner, who haven’t seen a girl for a long time, having extremely-intense-sexual-i-wanna-fuck-you vibe, right? But girls seem to be afraid of such guys i think.

Reply

Sixty September 15, 2010 at 2:35 pm

You read my other post. You know it’s not about you, it’s about her. If it’s her fantasy to hook up with a fresh guy who just got out of prison, then his intense desire for sex will make sure it happens. Whereas if it’s her fantasy to hookup with a hipster for the night, most of the time it will not happen because the guy has no desire to offer the sex.

If she’s repulsed by a man of any archetype, it doesn’t matter. Thus why your prison inmate would not have a ton of women throwing themselves at him

Reply

Anonymous September 15, 2010 at 3:14 pm

“You know it’s not about you, it’s about her”
Finally understood it, thanks.
So sad..

Reply

M September 15, 2010 at 10:11 am

What about “Woman love through ears” ? ;)
“The mind is the sexiest part of a man” ? ;)

Reply

Sixty September 15, 2010 at 2:36 pm

Like below, a woman can rationalize however the hell she wants about why she likes a guy, but in the end… attraction is a mysterious thing. I think compatibility factors play more into sustaining a relationship more than anything, but how many women have you heard cry desperately how much they want to be attracted to the nice guy chasing him who’s perfect on paper for her, yet she cannot?

When you fight with nature, you lose

Reply

Alfredo September 16, 2010 at 12:59 am

Interesting post Sixty.
Although I’ve been following your method for quite a while I still have troubles getting to the ‘sex offer’ moment. I feel weird because I don’t have a place to fuck, what are some ways (maybe suggesting to go to her place) but a lot of girls live with their parents (in my age range at least).

Im looking forward to read more articles from you. The Hand caressing is gold and definitely a 100% sign the girl likes you.
Maybe what I miss is a ‘reprogramming’ of beliefs. Somehow the idea of ‘women loving pleasure’ is still not inscripted on my mind whenever I interact with a girl.

Reply

Sixty September 17, 2010 at 10:31 am

Not having a place to bring her to is a cop out. If you want to bang her bad enough you will find somewhere. In a park, in your car, in her car, at her place, in the club bathroom, in a random bathroom, in an alley, it does not matter.

I think you are missing the whole point of mutual hand caressing, it is not a test to see if she likes you. That is merely one piece of information it gives you. MHC makes her commit to being a part of the seduction so that it’s MUTUAL.

People using MHC as being scared of finding out if she likes you or not are not using it for its intended purpose. You keep going for the MHC with a woman with high initial interest because you are trying to get her to play on the same team with you

Not sure how much more clear I can make it than women love pleasure. You can replace women with pretty much anything. Dogs love pleasure. Men love pleasure. Your pet loves pleasure. Drinking is a pleasure for some people. Most people find pleasure in eating very good food. In the same way, so is sex. So stop being bashful and give it to her

Reply

Anonymous September 17, 2010 at 12:18 pm

“If you want to bang her bad enough you will find somewhere. In a park, in your car, in her car, at her place, in the club bathroom, in a random bathroom, in an alley, it does not matter.”
So you suggest to completely give up masturbation to achieve that level of horniness?

Reply

Sixty September 18, 2010 at 12:24 pm

Do you masturbate every day? If you can, then you can have the drive to fuck a different girl every day too. I’m sure you don’t keep using the same clip over and over either so the answer to your question is if you can put in the work to be able to have your brain realize you can see a girl, go over, and most likely seduce her. One of my good friends sleeps with 10 new women every 14 days on average. He doesn’t need any kind of sex deprivation to instinctively be like “time to seduce her” when he sees a girl he likes

Reply

Workout without Weights September 18, 2010 at 2:01 am

Great blog post man, I actually took some of this and used it tonight. It worked well, like shockingly well. I think I might have been subconsciously of the sexual tension when two people meet but I pushed it away trying to game the girls. Tonight, the first girl I spoke to I ended up kissing a few minutes later. It’s impressive, and I really believe in your system.

My question is, how do you open a women and create this sexual tension. When you meet eyes and it’s on, it seems easy, but if you’re opening her, how do you generate the ‘you qualifying her’ frame. I also had a few sets that despite the eye contact, and pausing, the girl just seemed bored, not interested, do I need to escalate more, get closer or what?

Great stuff Sixty, I’m liking this style, it’s a nice refresher from the general community chatter.

Jack Bronson

Reply

Sixty September 18, 2010 at 12:30 pm

1. Introduce yourself (so she knows you are not idly chatting her up and you are there for HER)
2. Milk the intro
3. Escalate the vibe
4. Mutual Hand Caressing
5. Sexual Kino/Arousal
6. Pleasure Offer

I describe what you asked in much detail in the first book of my system, “Women Ignition”. Also, I devoted a months worth of audio to escalating the vibe, which is what you are asking about

Reply

Anonymous November 30, 2010 at 10:50 am

It’s so funny that society(men & women) tell you complete opposite:
1. Say something clever and make her laugh vs tell her you are there for her
2. Show you are polite and respectful vs Milk the intro
3. Make her like you(make her laugh\DHV\not interested\cool job) vs Escalate the vibe
4. Be friends first\dates(dinners)\gifts(teddy bears& roses)\confessions of love vs MHC fast
5. Do you want to kiss me\Hope she likes me\Am I cool enough vs Arousal kino\She doesn’t have to like me
6. She should choose for sex\One shot to take home\buy sex with spending time&money\Sex is her gift to you vs Multiple persistant non-needy pleasure offers (She’ll like sex with you much more than your personality\Everything she says is ASD)

Reply

eduard koopman October 18, 2010 at 10:02 am

I’m starting to get so fed up and espacially bored, with all the pointless dates I’ve been going on in the past times. And also the many flakes.
This posts makes me see why. Because everything, I do from the start on. Is all kinds of stuff to make the probability of rejection so low as I can/possible. And have I gotten good at that.
The reason I do this, was because I thought dates will give high probability of sex. But all I find myself going on, are social dates. And to be honest, I don’t care so much about all the girls their views and stuff happening to them.
I often end up thinking, what a waste of time (for me).

I was also measuring my success by the ratio of positive responses. Now, I see. It’s at best an measurment of my social capability.
It will probably be an thing for me, to unlearn/stop my thinking about trying to recieve as many possible prositive initial reactions. When you wrote: ‘the guy kicks himself a little bit for not “escalating” more and pushing it’. That’s me. I stopped that, because it many times got bad reactions. And not so much that I can’t handle bad reactions, but I always believed I should do the things to avoid those bad reactions. And when enough bad reactions are avoided, and tim passe by. The time will make her see me more and more as a sexual prospects. So I thought everytime I did something that caused a bad reaction from a girl, I didd something that screwed up my chances to have sex with her. Which might or would have happened if i didn’t screw it up.
Now changing that to an different attitude (of sexy vibe and persistence in physical contact)
might cause me some hard times (in my head), like you said: ‘To give up the things that most others think is your strongest suit is going to be one of the hardest things you ever do’.

Thanks for the good post! BRO

Reply

Sixty October 20, 2010 at 11:56 am

And another one sees the light :) Good job.

Reply

Gaurav October 11, 2011 at 6:09 am

I re-read this article and this comment from Eduard every now and then (I was doing the exact same things) to keep me focused on the important things. I have made the mistake earlier of confusing positive reactions with “how good I am getting”. No more. I can’t thank you enough for how much your book and your articles have helped me progress.

Reply

Sixty November 8, 2011 at 9:42 pm

Was great having you on BC Gaurav, hope you’re doing well.

Reply

M October 31, 2010 at 6:13 pm

Last week I went on a date with a girl.
Got to MHC.
Compliments, tension, arousal-kino(ass-grabbing, she sits on my lap)
The girl said: “I’m just a toy for you am not I? Are you serious or not?”
I told her that “It’s too early to talk about something serious, but i’ll not run away afterwards, only bad boys do it”.
Made sex-offer 3 times. She says it’s too early, i say that’s fine, smile.

Chris, the thing is, your stuff seems to work like magic(got to kissing+arousal kino) with interested girls, but I’m a bit unsure about this “toy” thing, since most of the things were non-verbal(not much talking), did I insult her, that I didn’t try to know her better or it’s just a test?
Not to mention that I’m bombarded with messages from different girls that they need “to be friends first, and then maybe sex; that I should court them in a nice way; and that my moving closer is too early and a tough move for such a quality woman; that i’m a maniac and too needy for sex; a guy who doesn’t rush for sex and enjoys dates is so cool.. etc” and they all seem very convincing, logical and true.

Reply

M November 2, 2010 at 6:56 am

Just for scientific purposes I asked a girl who gave me IOIs, laughed, stared at me, but who gave me such resistance about moving closer and “too needy for sex” thing. She says she is attracted to me, and wants to spend time with me and know me better, but she is looking for something serious and reliable, not short term.

So, Chris, you seem to be pretty right about
-It’s not you it’s the SEX
-It’s not you it’s her AGENDA
-Beware of the women who makes you feel bad for revealing sexual interest. She is playing you for BOYFRIEND role.

I’m going to get a virtual credit card for internet-payments in several days and buy a product of yours to appreciate you for your work.

Reply

Sixty November 2, 2010 at 11:42 am

One of the worst ways to undermine your success with women is by asking them why this or that didn’t work. People may think they know what they want, but they don’t know what they respond to and what will make them act uncontrollable and out of character for you. It’s not just women, why else do you think there are so many people who meet a guy/girl who on paper is exactly what they want, but for some reason they’re not attracted to them at all?

It’s good you’re getting to the pleasure offer, but yeah there’s a lot of stuff in my system that I don’t really cover here–mainly on specifics of what to do etc. For one, “needing” to have sex is not really where you want to be. You WANT to have sex, and if she’s not going to be a part of that, that’s fine, you’ll find something else. But I think more importantly is the question of whether or not you are making the pleasure offer as a yes/no logical choice to her or if you’re leveraging her natural desire to mate with a man.

One way you pose a question to her logical mind which has been trained to not seem like a promiscuous girl, the other you grab her hand, lead her out and have to actively force her to stop nature from taking its course. Plus, there’s little tidbits like resisting the urge to makeout and kiss and using them like nitro for the seduction. That’s the difference between making her explicitly say she wants to go home the same night with you and being in the moment where she gets swept away and thinks “it just happened because we had such a strong connection”

Reply

Ivan Dyn November 1, 2010 at 3:03 pm

Great article,
finally some one who admits that most of what is taught in the seduction community is BULLSHIT :) .
One comment though: for some guys it is very hard to get in touch with their “masculine core” (the nature side in your text). They are too much in their heads and don’t know how to get out of there. There are great tools out there that, if practiced consistently, can ring you into a more present state and get in touch with you “nature”.

Reply

Vincent November 7, 2010 at 10:54 am

Wow! You should make a in-field video of this stuff, SIXTY!

Reply

tomcat November 26, 2010 at 9:32 am

new content???

Reply

eduard koopman December 4, 2010 at 4:46 pm

Here you can find some recent posts. They are most of the times, more small comments then articles. the link is: http://www.60yearsofchallenge.com/category/seduction_artist/

Reply

Sixty December 15, 2010 at 4:49 pm

Yes, i prefer to keep this blog full of my best stuff, the other stuff is just random things on my mind

Reply

Richard ST December 31, 2010 at 10:51 pm

Great stuff Sixty!

I was dumped by several girls during my college days & always wonder what was wrong with me. I could get along well with girls, having all the boy-next -door image (only those days particularly) but somehow no one seemed keen to be romantically involved.

Just the right explanation : I was good with women, not seducing them!

But still it is a matter of time, one fine day, you WILL meet someone, even without seducing them. Only that probably it is not the women of your choice.

regards

Reply

Pros March 1, 2011 at 11:06 pm

Sixty, I was part of your elite audio club for sometime. I learned a lot of stuff especially with hand carassing which is my main method now of escalating at first.

Now I’m going to disagree with you a bit on the concept of having a good interaction and getting electricity. The street example you provided shows a good scenario. When the guy met the girl on the street he left feeling electric and she left feeling good. He did a good deed by making a woman feel good. As a result he feels good and can carry that energy the rest of the day. This is called Good KARMA.

The key really is smoothyl moving from that emotional high and electricity state to a seductive vibe. In that scenario, lets say he flirts and makes her feel good, he can then step closer and start mutual hand caressing and see if there is a chance that they could perhaps hook up. If not at least he got a good kick.

Reply

Sixty March 25, 2011 at 1:35 pm

Pros,

I don’t think we’re talking about different things, I talk 100% about how much better you do once you get rejection out of the way. And you’re right, you do feel better by doing a good deed, but the problem lies in the fact that you sacrificed moving it from social to seductive in fear of having it go badly. You said yourself, the key is moving from social to seductive. If you fear seductive and that is why you stayed in social, you are guaranteed to fail.

Reply

Zardoz March 3, 2011 at 5:58 pm

The community is evolving rapidly. I remember a few years ago I decided to remove almost all community jargon from my vocabulary and writing. It was hard because some of the lingo is actually useful. Words like, “Set,” and “state.”

I really like your stuff Sixty. I should come hang in New York sometime.

Reply

60 fan April 11, 2011 at 2:19 am

60, I love your material for its simplicity but Im curious if it will work during a dinner date on a day2 after following up with a girl I met on the street or some girl which I had not met for a long time. Isn’t it weird to not make verbal communication and only just communicating on the nonverbal level, especially when you are sitting at a table having meal? Also will it really work on day game? I get the impression that your stuff is more practical on nightgame. Thanks.

Reply

Sixty June 3, 2011 at 9:02 pm

Night game has more of an element of randomness and more propensity for things to go wrong. That’s why we teach about the hardest environment to succeed in. The principles of seduction do not change at a certain hour. The only thing that does is your own distinction you randomly make about what’s “weird” behavior and what’s not. In my first book, I say the first thing you have to do is risk creepy. If you’re not risking creepy, you’re also simultaneously ensuring little to no chance of seducing her.

Reply

Faust December 15, 2011 at 9:42 am

Hey Chris. Big fan of yours since 2008, I’ve read your system and planning to get the elite audio club stuff soon, though I’m having some trouble implementing your system into full action so I got a few questions and need some troubleshooting. That would take some burden of Me if you answered.

1. When do you know that the girl is not interested and just give up, is there a time-limit?

I’m quite good looking though not very social, My game really waters down when a girl doesn’t give anything to work with for me so usually I just keep the girls which chase me abit atleast, So should I just try for MHC again, even though she’s giving me the WTF face with big verbal rejects when I try to grab her hand? One of the reactions I sometimes get when I open is the neutral response from women; no initial enthusiasm or indifference to my serious, humble vibe even after milking the intro. Surely I can’t give up on my humour and must stay social and high-energy at the very start?

2. Does this work in dates that get set up through social circles?

I remember when I was in a date with one beautiful girl from the bar I worked in, we talked when we had free time, but the she threw some stupid shit test like what’s going on with you today, your weird? That’s when I tried the seductive tension release look and she perceived me weird, attraction wasn’t that high anymore.

3. At the very point is it bad to handle her tests, challenges, cold vibe with humour or verbal statements more often?

A relative I have is natural with women and he could blatantly claim that he slept with over hundrets of women, the philosophy of his is that all girls are bitches,whores except the virgin ones lol he says that women like fun, upbeat guys and ones who can deliver a good verbal game, thats why I’m trying to figure out should I give any attention to my verbal skills or just risk creepy all the time making direct statements with escalation.

Reply

Sixty January 4, 2012 at 10:47 am

1. The time limit should be however long you feel like dealing with her. If she’s giving you nothing right off the bat but you like her a lot, then keep going. Worst she’ll do is leave. The WTF face with big verbal rejection = signs you are on the right path. At least you’re taking action. I ask you too though, what’s the alternative to not staying in with her longer and trying for her? Are you going to talk to a new girl right away? If not, do whatever is more likely to lead to you getting laid. Ejecting and standing around will not, that’s for sure.

2. A seducer is a seducer is a seducer. You are still learning so if you don’t want backlash to bleed into your personal life, you may not want to try it with people you have to see on a daily/weekly basis for work. She’s right, you were doing something weird aka something you normally don’t do. She knows who you are normally, so if you act outside of that context, she will label it weird. Whether it’s a good weird or bad weird is determinant on your progress as a seducer and her feeling of receptivity towards being seduced by you.

3. A good verbal game can definitely help spark up the conversation, but if you go out you’ll see PUA’s running social game and never escalating. This is why they never get laid or very rarely do so. It’s much more important to practice your seduction skills rather than your social. If you aren’t even opening, then yeah you need to get social enough to open. It’s pretty simple

Reply

Leave a Comment